Would you like to receive Club Dog Newsletters?X Close Window
Please provide us with your email address in order to access this valuable pet content.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are required.
* Are you at least 13 years old?
YesNo
* First Name:
* Last Name:
* Email:
* City:
* State/Province:
* Enter the code shown:

* I would like to receive the monthly newsletter from DogChannel.com as well as occasional relevant Purina offers.
YesNo
If you select yes, DogChannel.com will send you their monthly newsletter. If after your first newsletter, you would like to terminate your free newsletter, you may opt-out and retain your membership to earn points towards free products. You may also get an occasional relevant email from Purina, sponsor of DogChannel.com.
What should the U.S. government's highest priority be with regard to pet issues?
Consumer protection issues, including ensuring pet food is safe
Issues involving public safety and health
Animal welfare issues
Environmental issues
It should not be involved in pet issues


Nylabone Big Chew Style: Ham Steak
More Info »
Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

AVMA Opposes Dog Ear Cropping, Tail Docking

Vet association affirms opposition to such procedures for purely cosmetic reasons.

Posted: November 29, 2008, 5 a.m. EST

The American Veterinary Medical Association Executive Board issued a revised policy on Wednesday clarifying its stance on ear cropping and tail docking.

The revised policy states: “The AVMA opposes ear cropping and tail docking of dogs when done solely for cosmetic purposes. The AVMA encourages the elimination of ear cropping and tail docking from breed standards.”

“For many years the AVMA has acknowledged that ear cropping and tail docking of dogs for cosmetic purposes are not medically indicated nor of benefit to our canine patients,” said Ron DeHaven, DVM, chief executive officer of the AVMA. “Our latest policy revision doesn’t represent a change in perspective, but, rather, makes that perspective clear with a stronger statement.”

The decision to strengthen the association’s policy resulted from a scheduled review of the existing policy.

“Why we perform certain procedures is one of the first questions we ask,” said Gail Golab, DVM, director of the AVMA Animal Welfare Division. “‘Cosmetic’ implies the basis for these procedures is to alter the dog’s appearance. Welfare risks identified included those associated with surgical procedures, i.e., anesthetic complications, pain, blood loss, and infection. In the committee’s opinion, the risk-benefit analysis supports professional opposition to performing these procedures for purely cosmetic reasons.”

However, AVMA points out that if the surgery is needed to protect the health and welfare of the dog — for therapeutic or preventive purposes — then it would support the appropriate surgery.

The American Kennel Club responded to the AVMA’s newly amended policy on ear cropping and tail docking, and stated that mislabeling these procedures as cosmetic was a “severe mischaracterization that connotes a lack of respect and knowledge of history and the function of purebred dogs.” The AKC also stated that breed standards are established and maintained by AKC parent clubs (each of the AKC-registered breeds is stewarded by a breed-specific parent club) keeping foremost in mind the welfare of the breed and the function it was bred to perform.

 Give us your opinion on
AVMA Opposes Dog Ear Cropping, Tail Docking
Submit a Comment
Reader Comments
Let's start doing it to little newborn babies since it's not a cruel thing to do.
mack, 07030, NJ
Posted: 6/21/2009 5:57:13 AM
I happen to own an 8 year old Australian shepard whose tail is docked. When we bought her she was eight weeks old and the procedure had already been done. She would be the same dog with a tail as she is without one. If you are not looking to show a dog, there is no point to having earcropping or taildocking done. I think it is a great idea to remove these procedures from breed standards to prevent the suffering of young puppies. If the breeder had asked me if I wanted my puppy's tail docked, I would have said no.
Dory, Lincoln, RI
Posted: 6/18/2009 9:19:49 AM
Cropping, tail docking and dew claw removal should be the CHOICE of the owner of the dogs, not some off the wall PETA type people who don't like it. I have had both Great Danes and Dobermans, and the procedure is done when the puppies are very young by professionals, and it does not hurt the animals. If you do not like it, then just don't own dogs and don't give us grief about how we like our certain breeds of dogs kept. I have taped ears for many years and have never had a problem. Maybe we should outlaw plastic surgery while we're at it too. Put your "oh poor dog" energy into going after Amish breeders and puppy mills!
S. Carlson, Palmetto, FL
Posted: 12/2/2008 3:47:45 PM
I absolutely agree. I don't see any scenario where tail docking and ear cropping is beneficial to the breed. The AKC should take it's head out of the mud and realize that not only are these procedures cruel but that they in no way enhance the breed. It's akin to soring in gaited horses.
Galadriel, Lothlorien, ME
Posted: 11/30/2008 11:05:34 PM
View Current Comments

Name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:

Clicker Training
Buy Now
Dog Training Solutions
Buy Now
Grooming Your Dog
Buy Now


Hi my name's WILLIE #76421 THANK YOU DC FRIENDS

Visit the Photo Gallery to
cast your vote!