Request to Keep Dog Ordinance Gets Denied

City of Reading, Pa., sought restrictions on aggressive dog breeds.

Posted: February 5, 2009, 5 a.m. EST

A request for an appeal made by the city of Reading, Pa., to keep an ordinance that set restrictions on aggressive dog breeds was recently denied by the state Supreme Court.

The 10-year-old measure was thrown out in a February 2008 ruling that stated it violated state law. Dogs deemed to be aggressive or dangerous – usually those involved in a dog bite incident – were targeted in the measure, which required that these animals be muzzled and kept on leashes shorter than three feet.

In addition, violators were fined up to $1,000 or ordered to serve 30 days in jail. Under the law, owners also had to get a $500 permit to keep an unsterilized dog of the breed.

Because there is no opportunity to revisit the issue, the ordinance has been rendered obsolete.


4 of 5 Comments View All 5 Comments

Give us your opinion Give us your opinion on Request to Keep Dog Ordinance Gets Denied

User Avatar

Maggie   Lancaster, PA

11/5/2009 4:03:02 AM

thank goodness this didn't pass!

User Avatar

Debbie   Ephrata, PA

2/5/2009 5:35:41 PM

It seems that these days , some people want to regulate EVERYTHING! Get a life people.

User Avatar

leah   smyrna, TN

2/5/2009 2:19:52 PM

datt izz stupidddddd:(

User Avatar

Trina   Irvine, KY

2/5/2009 7:47:13 AM

When is Breed Specific Legislation going to stop? I have had enough already. Most of the time, it is the owners who are not responsible enough for the dogs they choose to get. It's not the dogs fault that their owners are uneducated!

Login to get points for commenting or write your comment below

First Name : Email :
International :
City : State :

Captcha Image

Get New Captcha

Top Products