Your E-mail:
Get the latest news, tips and
free advice every month
Cast Your Vote
Which group do you think the 2012 Westminster “Best in Show” winner will be from?
Local Guides



Flexi All-Belt 3 Retractable Belt Leash in Blue (Large; 16' Length; For Pets up to 150 lbs.)
Regular Price: $49.99
Sale Price: $39.99
Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

U.S. Army Revises Pet Policy

Military families on privatized housing not allowed to own “aggressive” dogs.

Posted: February 27, 2009, 5 a.m. EST

The Department of the Army issued a revision to its pet policy for privatized housing that bans residents from owning “aggressive or potentially aggressive” dog breeds.

According to a memo detailing the new pet policy, the restricted breeds are defined as “Pit Bulls (American Staffordshire Bull Terriers or English Staffordshire Bull Terriers), Rottweilers, Doberman Pinschers, Chow [Chows], and wolf hybrids.” The prohibition also applies to other dogs who show “a propensity for dominant or aggressive behavior,” the January 2009 memo states.

For example, dogs who exhibit unprovoked barking, growling, or snarling at people approaching would be prohibited. The policy also describes aggressive behavior as biting or scratching people, running along fence lines when people are present, and escaping confinement or restriction to chase people.

The policy is effective immediately. Tenants who already own a breed named in the new pet policy can keep the dog as long as the animal doesn’t demonstrate behavior problems.

Additionally, the pet policy prohibits exotic animals, including reptiles, ferrets, and rats. According to the memo, the new policy takes into consideration the safety, welfare, and quiet enjoyment of all residents in privatized housing.

 Give us your opinion on
U.S. Army Revises Pet Policy

Submit a Comment   Join Club
Earn 1,000 points! What's this?

Reader Comments
This is horrible. If a dog is aggressive it should be dealt with as an individual. It is wrong to punish everyone for what one mistreated dog does. They should real this law as soon as possible. We don't punish an entire race for what one person does, so why should this be any different?
Robin, Rockville, MD
Posted: 12/3/2009 8:35:49 AM
I don't agree with that either. I have a pitbull, she's not aggressive, she's so cute, she sleep with me in my own bed. Pitbulls are not aggressive by nature, we make them aggressive. I enlisted and I'll ship to basic on June, so I wanna bring my pitbull to the base. Is my pet, my friend!!
Jason, San Juan, PR
Posted: 3/16/2009 7:42:26 PM
I don't agree with that. I grew up around Dobermans and Rotts, and my best friend has a handsome and very sweet pit. Should we be punished and not be allowed to keep our best friends just because OTHER PEOPLE don't properly socialize and fulfill their dogs needs?
Jessica, West Richland, WA
Posted: 2/27/2009 9:45:36 PM
check with the cdc and vets. this is not scientific. there is no evidence that pit bulls, which do not exist as a breed, are more dangerous than other dogs. further there are no accurate breed numbers period. these honorable dogs were heroes in both the civil war and both world wars. one was made an honorary sergeant after it was injured but learned to detect mustard gas long before it was near troops.. civilized places simply ban dangerous dogs. that should be enough. these are not flesh-eating chimpanzees, which, no kidding, i heard my town of denver wants to ban.
Robert Weller, Denver, CO
Posted: 2/27/2009 8:37:53 PM
View Current Comments

Name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:

Ask the Dog Keeper
Buy Now
Cocker Spaniels
Buy Now
House Training
Buy Now
Become a fan of DogChannel on Facebook Follow DogChannel on Twitter Follow DogChannel on Google+ Follow DogChannel with RSS
Get social and connect with DogChannel.



Hi my name's Mica Mia #223930 Help me get 100 Votes!

Visit the Photo Gallery to
cast your vote!