Missouri Approves Controversial Dog Breeding Rules

Proposition B establishes new regulations for "large-scale” dog breeding facilities.

Posted: November 5, 2010, 2 a.m. EDT

Dog and white pillarsMissouri voters approved a controversial measure on Tuesday that establishes new regulations for the state’s “large-scale” dog breeding operations.

Proposition B, otherwise known as the Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act, requires any person who owns more than 10 unaltered female dogs for the purpose of breeding to follow certain standards for feeding, veterinary care, housing, exercise and rest cycles between breeding.

Under the measure, approved by a narrow margin of 51.6 percent to 48.4 percent, no person will be allowed to have custody of more than 50 dogs for the purpose of breeding. Violations of the law, which takes effect in November 2011, will be a misdemeanor, with a penalty of up to 15 days in jail and a $300 fine.

Some of the nation’s most powerful animal-welfare groups had waged war over the proposed new rules for dog breeding in Missouri, a state long known for a high number of so-called “puppy mills.” The ballot initiative was launched by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), Humane Society of Missouri and Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation. Supporters touted the measure as a much-needed tool to help police Missouri’s large-scale commercial dog breeders and ensure dogs receive humane care.

Opponents, such as the American Kennel Club and Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC), called the measure excessive and unnecessary, since state and federal laws already govern Missouri’s dog breeders. They also said some of the provisions were cost-prohibitive and would force licensed breeders out of business.

Ed Sayers, ASPCA president and CEO, hailed the passage of Prop B as a “landmark achievement in the ongoing fight against animal cruelty.”

“The potential impact of Proposition B is staggering,” he said. “We are more hopeful than ever that the strong momentum around puppy mill cruelty will push other states to follow Missouri’s lead, causing a ripple effect throughout the nation.”

Michael Maddox, vice president of governmental affairs and general counsel for PIJAC, said the passage of Prop B furthers the anti-pet agenda and will adversely affect the availability of pet dogs, as some breeders will be driven out of business. He also said the use of a ballot initiative to institute new pet industry regulations sets a “very poor precedent.”

“Ballot initiatives favor organizations that have a lot of money because they can plant their message through the airwaves,” he said. “And it makes it more difficult to educate voters the way you can educate legislators about the true impact of these types of proposals.”

To read provisions of the act, click here.


4 of 7 Comments View All 7 Comments

Give us your opinion Give us your opinion on Missouri Approves Controversial Dog Breeding Rules

User Avatar

TC   Houston, TX

11/8/2010 4:37:29 PM

Interesting to say the least!

User Avatar

Kirsten   Naperville, IL

11/7/2010 11:38:39 PM


I believe that that is the point; selling puppies should not be done for monetary profit. Generally speaking people lose more money than they gain in this business. However, breeders gain the knowledge and contentment in that they continued their specialized breed so that healthy puppies are being born that people can identify with in terms of personality traits. 50 dogs is way more than enough for a breeder to responsibly care for. Although I do have a question, is the 50 limit in terms of 50 dogs/bitches for breeding, or 50 counting dogs, bitches, and puppies?

User Avatar

Kim   South Bend, IN

11/6/2010 7:09:56 PM

I sincerely hope that Mr. Maddox was joking when he said that breeders going out of business would affect the availability of dogs. Unless our dog over population crisis was solved overnight and I wasn't aware?

User Avatar

Galadriel   Lothlorien, ME

11/5/2010 5:46:31 PM

I'm disappointed in this. Too much government interference. 5o dogs is not very many if it's your source of income. I think that rather they should set up inspections to ensure quality care.

Login to get points for commenting or write your comment below

First Name : Email :
International :
City : State :

Captcha Image

Get New Captcha

Top Products