Comments on Missouri Lawmakers Seek to Modify Dog Breeding Rules

User Avatar

KAY   CLINTON, MO

4/20/2011 8:14:17 PM

THEY NEED TO LEAVE THE LAW AS IS AT THE TIME IT WAS VOTED ON AND PASSED. ALL THE LAW DOES IS ENFORCE GOOD SENSIBLE AND RESPONSABLE DOG OWNERSHIP. ANY TRULY RESPONSABLE BREEDER ALREADY FOLLOWS THESE LAWS WITHOUT HAVING TO BE TOLD BECAUSE OF THEIR COMMITTMENT AND LOVE OF THE BREED OF THEIR CHOICE.IT'S ABOUT TIME STATES TOOK STEPS SUCH AS THESE AND I'M PROUD TO BE A RESIDENT OF MISSOURI FOR BEING ONE OF THE FIRST.

User Avatar

Stephanie   North Canton, OH

1/26/2011 4:37:41 PM

Hmm...

User Avatar

Galadriel   Lothlorien, ME

1/25/2011 10:45:53 PM

I hope it gets repealed. Why is it so wrong to breed dogs for profit. Every other animal is bred for this reason. I do believe that inspections would be a good idea to ensure that the dogs are happy and healthy but other than that, why limit
it?

People who breed cattle and sheep certainly aren't limited to 50 females. Most would agree that is ridiculous.

User Avatar

Reta   East Hartford, CT

1/25/2011 6:25:20 PM

Though I am not a resident of this state, these laws are important to me and to anyone in the dog fancy. Only SB 95, which would make the law stronger, would help dogs. People who care more about money than about lives (those trying to weaken or eliminate the law) scare me.

User Avatar

Melanie   Winnipeg, MB

1/25/2011 5:26:57 PM

sounds like a good plan

ADS BY GOOGLE

User Avatar

Cheryl   Kansas City, KS

1/25/2011 2:30:12 PM

I hope that they leave this alone and it goes into effect as is.

1-6 of 6 PAGE:  1

Top Products

ADS BY GOOGLE