Critics Say Proposed Dog Law Changes Go Too Far

Pennsylvania’s agriculture secretary defends the higher standards for kennels outlined in legislation.

Posted: June 17, 2008, 5 a.m. EDT

Printer Friendly

Legislation that calls for big changes to Pennsylvania’s Dog Law will benefit dogs in commercial breeding kennels, supporters of a newly introduced bill recently told a state House panel.

House Bill 2525 would force commercial dog kennels to increase the space requirements for cages, stop using wire flooring in the cages, do away with stacking of cages, and provide annual veterinary checkups for dogs as well as an outdoor exercise area. It also mandates daily cage cleaning and sets temperature requirements of above 50 degrees and below 85 degrees.

Opponents, including sporting dog organizations, said that while something must be done about the state’s “puppy mill” issue, the bill goes too far. Rob Sexton, vice president for government affairs for the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance, testified before the panel and said his organization does not back legislation that could “criminalize and penalize sportsmen out of existence.”

The bill defines kennels as places that house more than 26 dogs per year. A subset called “commercial kennels” is defined as establishments that sell or transfer more than 60 dogs per year. The state’s current law treats all kennels the same, regardless of size or function.

Agriculture Secretary Dennis Wolff told the committee that the new standards would improve commercial dog breeding. “I want to be clear that we are not seeking to end commercial breeding operations in Pennsylvania,” he said in a statement. “We, instead, are seeking to raise the bar on these operations, which are clearly different from other types of kennels.”

Printer Friendly

JOIN CLUB DOG NOW

4 of 17 Comments View All 17 Comments

Give us your opinion Give us your opinion on Critics Say Proposed Dog Law Changes Go Too Far

User Avatar

Amy   Merriamck, NH

6/18/2008 11:14:40 AM

I think what PA is doing is awesome. In my opinion I'd go a few steps further with the guidelines. This puppy mill thing has gotten way out of hand. Not only do these poor innocent creatures suffer, but us humans who purchase these ill-bred dogs suffer when found that your beloved pup is gravely ill with a disease that could've been prevented by more careful breeding

User Avatar

Karen   Standish, ME

6/17/2008 7:06:04 PM

Thank you for this information!

User Avatar

Cheryl   Monaca, PA

6/17/2008 5:04:44 PM

This bill provides what should be considered the "bare minimum" for dogs. I lost my respect for the AKC when I found out they fight bills like these cause they are afraid the bills will step on their toes.

User Avatar

Cheryl   Monaca, PA

6/17/2008 4:56:33 PM

It's long past due and none of it sounds unreasonable when considering what is best for the animals in these situations.

Login to get points for commenting or write your comment below

 
First Name : Email :
International :
City : State :

Captcha Image


Get New Captcha


Top Products

ADS BY GOOGLE