City Scraps Plans for Mandatory Spay-Neuter

Huntington Beach, Calif., plans to draft an incentive-based resolution for those who alter and microchip their dogs and cats.

Posted: November 8, 2007, 5 a.m. EST

Printer Friendly

In a marathon city council session that began Monday afternoon and lasted until half-past midnight Tuesday morning, the Huntington Beach, Calif., City Council dropped its pursuit of a mandatory spay, neuter, and microchip ordinance in favor of incentive-based licensing fees that reward those who alter and microchip their pets.

After hearing spirited comments from a strongly divided audience that the packed auditorium, the council eventually decided to scrap the original legislation and direct the city attorney to draft a new resolution that would create a five-tier registration fee scale. The scale would reduce licensing fees for those whose pets are altered and microchipped in an effort to provide incentives for dog and cat owners.

The highest fees would be reserved for those whose pets are not spayed, neutered or microchipped.

Currently, cats are not required to be licensed in the city. The new ordinance would require cat licensing and the same tiered fee system would apply, however dog licensing fees will be higher. If it passes, the exact fees will be established at a future council meeting.

“It’s a great compromise solution,” said council member Don Hansen, who was opposed to the original ordinance. “It eliminates the mandatory nature and gives people the comfort that if they don’t want to alter their animals, they don’t have to alter their animals.”

In a straw vote, the council voted unanimously to draft the resolution for the tiered fee structure for dogs. The council voted 4 to 3 in favor of requiring cat licensing and applying the same tiered structure to felines.

In ascending order from lowest to highest licensing fees, the resolution will be drafted as follows: service animals; altered and microchipped animals; altered, but not microchipped animals; not altered, but microchipped animals; and not altered and not microchipped animals.

Competition animals would not be exempt from the higher, unaltered licensing fees.

The city attorney is expected to return with the new resolution at the Dec. 17, 2007, council meeting.

-Heidi Hatch, Associate News Editor for DogChannel.com

Printer Friendly

JOIN CLUB DOG NOW

4 of 5 Comments View All 5 Comments

Give us your opinion Give us your opinion on City Scraps Plans for Mandatory Spay-Neuter

User Avatar

sarah   chicago, IL

11/8/2007 5:43:29 PM

i hope that they go through with their plans! that would help out a lot.

User Avatar

Katie   Suwanee, GA

11/8/2007 3:06:41 PM

This is great!

User Avatar

megan   somewherein, OH

11/8/2007 7:56:32 AM

good
article

Body piercing saved my soul!

User Avatar

Cheril   Amarillo, TX

11/8/2007 6:40:17 AM

I disagree with Cheryl from Conway, MO. If you can afford to spay/neuter your pet, you can definitely afford to microchip them. Microchippins is cheaper than spaying/neautering.

Login to get points for commenting or write your comment below

 
First Name : Email :
International :
City : State :

Captcha Image


Get New Captcha


Top Products

ADS BY GOOGLE